ANSYS, Inc.

2600 Ansys Drive

Canonsburg, PA 15317

844-462-6797

March 28, 2022

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF

STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on Thursday, May 12, 2022

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF ANSYS, INC.

The annual meeting of stockholders of ANSYS, Inc. (“Ansys,” “we,” or the “Company”) will be held on Thursday, May 12, 2022, at 11:30 a.m. Eastern Time (the “2022 Annual Meeting”), virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/anss2022 for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 15, 2022 as the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2022 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only holders of record of common stock at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 2022 Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. In the event there are not sufficient shares to be voted in favor of any of the foregoing proposals at the time of the 2022 Annual Meeting, the 2022 Annual Meeting may be adjourned in order to permit further solicitation of proxies.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED AT THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING, WE URGE YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR VOTE VIA THE INTERNET, TELEPHONE, OR MAIL.

We appreciate your continued support of Ansys.

Very truly yours,

Janet Lee

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Virtual Annual Meeting

The 2022 Annual Meeting will be held virtually. We began to offer virtual annual meetings in 2016 to empower stockholders to participate fully and equally from any location around the world at no cost. We believe this is the right choice for a widely- held technology company with global operations, as it brings cost savings to Ansys and our stockholders by using a technology platform in line with our commitment to support innovative technology, while also increasing our engagement with stockholders, regardless of size, resources, or physical location. A virtual meeting is also environmentally friendly and furthers our strategic goal to operate our business in a sustainable manner.

We are sensitive to concerns regarding virtual annual meetings generally from investor advisory groups and other stockholder rights advocates who have voiced concerns that virtual meetings may diminish stockholder voice or reduce accountability. Accordingly, we have designed this virtual annual meeting format to enhance, rather than constrain, stockholder access, participation and communication. For example, the online format allows stockholders to communicate with us during the meeting so they can ask questions of our management. During the live Q&A session of the meeting, we will answer questions pertinent to the 2022 Annual Meeting matters as time permits. Questions regarding personal matters, including those related to employment, product issues or suggestions for product

innovations are not pertinent to the 2022 Annual Meeting and therefore will not be answered. Any questions pertinent to the 2022 Annual Meeting that cannot be answered during the 2022 Annual Meeting due to time constraints will be posted online and answered at https://investors.ansys.com/governance/proxy-materials/. If you wish to submit a question during the 2022 Annual Meeting, you may do so by logging into the virtual annual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/anss2022, typing your question in the “Ask a Question” field and clicking “Submit.” Although the live webcast is available only to stockholders at the time of the meeting, a replay of the meeting will be made publicly available for a minimum of one year at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/anss2022.

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any difficulties you may have accessing the virtual annual meeting. If you need technical support during the 2022 Annual Meeting, including to access the 2022 Annual Meeting’s virtual meeting platform, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting login page for assistance.

Additional information regarding the ability of stockholders to ask questions during the 2022 Annual Meeting, technical support, rules of conduct, and other materials for the 2022 Annual Meeting, including the list of our stockholders of record, will be available during the 2022 Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/anss2022.

Ansys develops and markets engineering simulation software and services used by engineers, designers, researchers and students around the world. Customers leverage Ansys solutions to create cutting-edge products across a variety of industries, including aerospace and defense, automotive, electronics, semiconductors, energy, turbomachinery, consumer products and healthcare. Ansys solutions empower users to design and analyze their products digitally, without the need for physical prototypes, saving customers money while speeding innovation. We distribute our technology through a direct global sales force and a network of channel partners.

We continue to invest in building advanced capabilities and have integrated our technology into an open and scalable platform that can be delivered both on-premises and in the cloud. Our compelling end-to-end portfolio includes products in mechanical, fluids, electromagnetics, semiconductors, systems, optics, photonics and materials, among other areas.

Our strategy of Pervasive Engineering Simulation^™ seeks to deepen the use of simulation in our core, to inject simulation throughout the product lifecycle and to embed simulation into our partners’ ecosystems. The engineering software simulation market is strong and growing. The market growth is driven by customers’ need for rapid, quality innovation in a cost-efficient manner, enabling faster time to market of new products and lower warranty

costs. We are investing in solutions to help engineers deal with increasing product complexity in:

In the longer term, we are also investing in opportunities around digital twins and simulation for additive manufacturing. Our strategy of Pervasive Engineering Simulation is aligned with the market growth.

To support that strategy, we will continue to follow a series of pillars that we believe will drive future growth. We will reinforce and extend our leadership in core and high-growth solutions. We will build and grow our offerings and expertise in adjacencies to our current core competencies. We will continue to pursue a smart and strategic acquisition strategy to grow our business, and we will partner with other industry leaders to broaden pervasive simulation into other ecosystems. Importantly, we will continue to win in the right way, built on a culture of and commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging.

Throughout 2021, Ansys responded to the impact of the global pandemic while maintaining a focus on executing our long-term strategy. We supported our employees, customers and communities during these difficult times by making the health and safety of our employees and their families, and our broad Ansys community around the world, a high priority.

Despite the global disruption in 2021, we maintained our focus and advanced our pervasive simulation strategy, creating long-term value for all our stakeholders. In fiscal year 2021, we delivered strong financial results and continued to innovate for our customers by developing capabilities organically as well as pursuing strategic acquisitions. Ansys continued to thrive with a culture that values innovation, inclusiveness, transparency and integrity.

We are proud of our “One Ansys” culture. In 2021, we were named to Fast Company’s annual list of the World’s Most Innovative Companies in the Enterprise category, and for the third year in a row, Fast Company ranked us as one of the best workplaces for innovators. Additionally, our employee diversity and inclusion efforts helped us to be recognized by the Great Places to Work Institute as one of the best places to work in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

Our focused execution yielded strong financial results, reflected in our annual contract value (“ACV”)* growth of

16% in both reported and constant currency*, GAAP operating margin of 26.9%, and, non-GAAP operating margin* of 41.4%, and record operating cash flows of $549.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. We had deferred revenue and backlog of $1,257.9 million as of December 31, 2021. We repurchased 0.3 million shares during the year at an average price per share of $388.35.

*Non-GAAP operating margin and constant currency are non-GAAP measures. For additional information on non-GAAP operating margin and constant currency, please see Annex A: Non-GAAP Reconciliations. ACV is a metric we use to better understand the business. There is no GAAP metric comparable to ACV. For a description of ACV, see the section titled “Performance Metrics for 2021 PSU Awards” in this proxy statement.

In addition, we delivered strong long-term total stockholder return (“TSR”) as indicated by the chart below, which shows how a $100 investment in Ansys on December 31, 2018 would have grown to $280.62 by December 31, 2021. The chart also compares the TSR of an investment in our common stock to the same investment over the last three years in the S&P 500 Index, the Nasdaq Composite Stock Market Index, the Nasdaq 100 Index and a peer group consisting of Autodesk, Inc., Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Dassault Systemes SE, PTC Inc., Synopsys, Inc., Altair Engineering Inc. and Aspen Technology, Inc.

In 2021, we maintained our commitment to investing in product innovation by making strategic acquisitions of market-leading technologies. We believe these investments expand our multi-physics portfolio and provide our customers with a full set of solutions to solve their next-generation design challenges. Our acquisition of Phoenix Integration, Inc. and its ModelCenter model-based systems engineering (“MBSE”) technology expands the scope of our solution offering, enabling users to connect a range of engineering tools together in multi-tool workflows for broad and robust MBSE. With this acquisition, we now offer a product that bridges the gap between engineering analyses and the systems architecture model addressing MBSE initiatives in the aerospace and defense industry. We also completed our acquisition of Zemax, LLC and its simulation tool for high-performance optical imaging systems, which expands our portfolio to provide comprehensive, end-to-end solutions for simulating sophisticated optical- and photonics-enabled products.

During 2021, we also introduced new capabilities to our product portfolio through organic development. We released Ansys 2021 R1 and R2, which deliver greater engineering insight with unprecedented speed and simplicity, equipping globally distributed teams to accelerate innovation across a wide range of industries. These releases enable greater design exploration, improve engineering productivity and provide solutions that help reduce costs while increasing product quality. Technology advancements across our product portfolio continue to redefine what is possible with simulation when addressing the increasing complexity of tomorrow’s next generation products.

Improvements in Ansys 2021 R2 products provide the power to explore early stage product design and complex system engineering from the nanometer scale of chip design to the mission level of aerospace and defense operating environments. Ansys’ industry-leading

simulation solutions provide an open approach that streamlines engineering via simplified workflows, integrated data management and easy access to HPC power via the cloud. With access to nearly limitless computing via Ansys Cloud, engineers who use Ansys 2021 R2 products have the speed and flexibility to ask the “what-if” questions that lead to innovations in autonomous vehicles, chip design, mission-critical connectivity solutions and more sustainable travel via lightweight materials and electrification.

Partnerships remain a key part of our pervasive simulation strategy. Our current partnerships continue to broaden and we are excited about the value we can bring to a wider ecosystem of customers.

In addition to our strong financial results and robust product development, we continued our investment in employee talent and engagement and the infrastructure needed to support faster growth and capture a larger addressable market. We continued to recruit top talent globally across our key regions, and we employed approximately 5,100 people as of December 31, 2021, including approximately: 1,900 in product development, 2,500 in sales, support and marketing, and 700 in general and administrative functions. Of these employees, 46% were located in the Americas, 27% were located in Europe, Middle East and Africa and 27% were located in Asia-Pacific.

Ansys is committed to corporate responsibility and furthering our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) progress. In 2021, we updated our Corporate Responsibility (“CR”) pillars to the following: (1) advancing sustainability through our products; (2) investing in our people and ONE Ansys culture; (3) operating sustainably and responsibly; and (4) collaborating with stakeholders. For more information see the “Corporate Responsibility” section of this proxy statement.

We take pride in our engagement with our stockholders. We welcome the insights and feedback from our stockholders and take our stockholders’ points of view into account when developing our governance practices. The Board firmly believes that the mutual trust we build with our stockholders is one of the key components of good governance and is an important element of driving Board responsibility and a strong governance culture.

We maintain an active dialogue with stockholders to ensure we thoughtfully consider a diversity of perspectives on issues including strategy, business performance, risk, culture and workplace topics, compensation practices, and a broad range of ESG issues. Ansys has an active investor relations program, engaging with investors globally via conferences, non-deal roadshows and investor calls. Throughout the year our Investor Relations group engages with our stockholders, frequently along with Dr. Gopal, Ms. Anasenes and other members of the management

team. During 2021, these outreach efforts involved representatives of stockholders holding, in the aggregate, over 45% of Ansys shares.

Our Office of the Corporate Secretary coordinates engagement with Investor Relations and provides a summary of relevant feedback to our Board. In February 2021, our Board Chair and members of management, including our General Counsel and a member of our Investor Relations team, engaged with a cross-section of active stockholders to discuss ESG topics. In addition, in December 2021 our Investor Relations team engaged in outreach efforts with several stockholders to discuss ESG topics.

To communicate broadly with our stockholders, we also share ESG information relevant to our stockholders through our investor relations website, our annual report and this proxy statement.

Ansys believes in corporate responsibility and furthering our ESG efforts with Board oversight of ESG matters and senior management responsibility for the design and development of ESG related programs. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board has general oversight responsibility over our ESG program, matters, and initiatives. In addition, cybersecurity is overseen by our Audit Committee and is a standing topic that is addressed at each quarterly meeting. Our Compensation Committee has oversight responsibility with respect to human resources and talent management, as specified in its charter. Our ESG program is led by a committee of select senior leaders (the “ESG committee”) from our human resources, finance, industry marketing, communications, investor relations, legal, cybersecurity, strategy, procurement, and facilities departments; our general counsel chairs this committee. The ESG committee also has two task teams to address specific topics related to environmental sustainability and human capital management. Task teams report to, and receive oversight from, the ESG committee.

In 2021, we updated our corporate responsibility pillars to the following:

Advancing sustainability through our products – At Ansys, we look for new and better ways to engineer what’s ahead. By focusing on the creation of new technology, and by making current technology better, we strive to support our customers in their design of products, including helping to make their products more efficient, with less waste, and minimizing physical prototyping.

Investing in our people and ONE Ansys culture – Our people are at the core of driving product innovation for our customers. We endeavor to create a culture of belonging and inclusion where everyone can be themselves and thrive as a ONE Ansys team.

Operating sustainably and responsibly – We are striving to reduce the environmental and climate impact of our operations by measuring, analyzing, and reducing our resource use and emissions. We have taken actions to promote ethical business practices, data security and good governance including:

Collaborating with stakeholders – We engage with our stockholders, customers, employees, communities, and other stakeholders through feedback, engagement surveys, and by supporting the communities in which we live and work. We believe collaborating with our stakeholders supports our business success.

Our Board is divided into three classes and is currently comprised of three directors in Class I, three directors in Class II and three directors in Class III. Directors serve for three-year terms with one class of directors being elected by our stockholders at each annual meeting.

At the 2022 Annual Meeting, three Class II directors are nominated for re-election to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2025 and until such directors’ successors are duly elected and qualified. Based on the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board has nominated Anil Chakravarthy, Barbara V. Scherer and Ravi K. Vijayaraghavan for election as Class II directors at the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Unless otherwise specified in the proxy, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the shares represented by each properly executed proxy for the election of Dr. Chakravarthy, Ms. Scherer and Mr. Vijayaraghavan. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. The nominees have agreed to stand for election and to serve, if elected, as directors. However, if any person nominated by our Board is unable to stand for election, the proxies will be voted for the election of

such other person or persons as our Board may recommend unless the Board determines to reduce the size of the Board.

We maintain a majority voting policy for the election of directors coupled with a resignation policy in uncontested elections. To be elected in an uncontested election, a director must receive a majority of the votes cast. This means that the number of votes cast “FOR” such nominee’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that nominee’s election. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

If, in any uncontested election of directors, any incumbent director nominee receives a greater number of votes cast “AGAINST” his or her re-election than “FOR” his or her re-election, he or she must promptly tender a resignation to the Board. The Board will then decide, through a process managed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and excluding the incumbent director nominee in question, whether to accept the resignation or take other action.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE CLASS II DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that at least a majority of the Board qualifies as independent directors under applicable federal securities laws and the listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”). Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also require that all members of the Board’s committees meet the criteria for independence established by the federal securities laws and the Nasdaq listing standards applicable to service on such committees. Nasdaq listing standards have both objective tests and a subjective test for determining who is an independent director. The objective tests include that the director not be an employee of the company and not have engaged in various types of business dealings with the Company. The subjective test requires the Board to affirmatively determine that the director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. During the Board’s annual review of director independence, the Board also considers transactions, relationships and arrangements between each director (or an immediate family member of the director) and the Company and management, as well as certain other factors that the Board deems relevant in determining independence, such as beneficial ownership of our capital stock.

The Board completed a review of the independence of each of our current directors and director nominees and determined that each of Mr. Calderoni, Dr. Chakravarthy, Ms. Dorchak, Mr. Frankola, Dr. Gallimore, Mr. Hovsepian, Ms. Scherer, and Mr. Vijayaraghavan is not an affiliate or employee of the Company and is independent under Rule 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board also previously determined that Mr. Dubois was independent under the Nasdaq listing standard and the Exchange Act until his retirement from the Board on May 14, 2021. Dr. Gopal is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and therefore is not considered an independent director.

Board Responsibilities

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to promote the effective functioning of the Board and its committees and provide the framework for our corporate governance. Our current Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the investor relations section of our website https://investors.ansys.com/ on the “Governance Documents” page under the “Governance” tab.

Oversight of Risk Management

The Board has responsibility to provide risk oversight as a part of each director’s obligations to us and our stockholders. The Board aims to set a healthy “tone at the top” and guides our management to take appropriate measures to control material risks. The Board executes on these responsibilities directly and through its standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Strategic Partnerships and Transactions Committee, each of which is comprised solely of members and chairs who qualify as independent

directors. While the Board believes that we practice good risk management strategies and processes, it is the Board’s responsibility to oversee the pressure testing of these strategies and processes on a continuous basis in order to ensure that risk management stays effective despite evolving market conditions, business strategies, regulatory rules, and our development.

Our Board delegates principal responsibility for its risk management and assessment functions to its Audit Committee. The Board directly receives a quarterly risk report from the General Counsel. Likewise, the Audit Committee receives a risk management update from our management as part of its regular quarterly meetings. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees our annual enterprise business risk assessment and bi-annual fraud risk assessment which are conducted by our internal auditor. The internal auditor delivers reports directly to the Audit Committee. This annual assessment reviews our performance with regard to ongoing financial, operational, and strategic risks, both existing and new. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees and reports to the Board on the progress of our CR program including the program’s initiatives in ESG areas.

Details on the activities and responsibilities of the Board’s committees are discussed later in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board provides oversight over risk that is material to our long-term stockholder value. The committees implement the Board’s risk oversight in particular focus areas, namely:

Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the full Board or individual directors by writing to:

ANSYS, Inc. Board of Directors

c/o General Counsel and Secretary ANSYS, Inc.

Southpointe

2600 Ansys Drive

Canonsburg, PA, 15317

The Secretary will deliver to the appropriate directors all communications addressed to the Board received at this address, except for spam, junk mail, mass mailings, solicitations, resumes, job inquiries, product complaints/inquiries, new product suggestions, surveys or other matters unrelated to the Company.

Related-Party Transactions

The Board has a written policy requiring the approval or ratification of Related Party Transactions by the Audit Committee (the “Policy”). For purposes of the Policy, “Related Party Transactions” generally include any transaction, arrangement, or relationship or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which Ansys or its subsidiaries is a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any of the following persons has a direct or indirect interest:

Under the Policy, a director, director nominee or executive officer must promptly notify the Office of the Corporate Secretary of any material interest that such person or an Immediate Family Member of such person had, has or may have in a transaction. The Corporate Secretary will review the proposed transaction and determine if it is subject to Audit Committee approval based on criteria described in the Policy.

Should a Related Party Transaction be subject to Audit Committee approval, the following factors, amongst others, will be considered: whether the terms are fair to Ansys; whether the terms are usual and customary in the market; whether the transaction is material to Ansys; whether the transaction is in the ordinary course of Ansys’ business; the role, if any, the related party has played in

arranging the transaction; the structure of the transactions; and the interests of all related persons in the transaction.

The Audit Committee may, in its sole discretion, approve or deny any Related Party Transaction. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Audit Committee Chair to approve, upon request of an executive officer of Ansys, Related Party Transactions if they arise between Audit Committee meetings. The Audit Committee Chair may take any action with respect to such Related Party Transaction that the Audit Committee would be authorized to take, or, in his or her discretion, require that the matter be brought before the full Audit Committee. Any action taken by the Audit Committee Chair shall be reported to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

In the event a Related Party Transaction is identified after the transaction commences, the transaction will be brought to the Audit Committee for ratification, amendment or termination. If a Related Party Transaction will be ongoing, the Audit Committee may establish guidelines for Ansys’ management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related person. Thereafter, the Audit Committee, on at least an annual basis, will review and assess ongoing relationships with the related person to see that they are in compliance with the Audit Committee’s guidelines and that the Related Party Transaction remains appropriate.

There were no Related Party Transactions requiring disclosure under SEC rules in 2021 or 2022 year-to-date.

Board Structure and Processes

Leadership Structure

The roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO of the Company are separated, and the role of Chairman is held by an independent director elected by the directors, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Hovsepian currently serves as the Chairman of the Board and has the principal responsibility for communicating with the Board members and presiding at meetings of the Board, which ensures that our independent directors have a strong voice in the leadership of the Board and risk oversight.

For information on how the Board’s responsibility for risk oversight impacts its leadership structure, see “Oversight of Risk Management” above.

Our Chairman of the Board is the primary point of consultation with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regarding director nominations and process and management succession planning, which we believe helps maintain a strong and independent direction to our highest-level governance matters. We believe that this structure provides our Board with the greatest breadth of leadership and depth of experience, while also providing balance for the direction of the Company. It gives primary responsibility for our operational leadership to our CEO. The Chairman of the Board facilitates our Board’s independent oversight of management, enables communication between the management and the Board, and leads the Board’s consideration of governance matters. The Nominating and

Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the Board’s leadership structure and, when appropriate, recommends changes in response to evolving needs.

Board Processes

Each standing committee of the Board conducts an evaluation of its effectiveness each year. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annual evaluation of the Board. The purpose of the evaluations is to identify areas of strength and areas for improvement in the activities and effectiveness of each committee and the Board. The evaluations for 2021 took the form of candid interviews conducted by outside counsel with each director. Outside counsel then facilitated a discussion of the findings from the interviews with the Board.

We support and encourage the continuing education of our Board members. We maintain membership in the National Association of Corporate Directors and reimburse the directors for their expenses in connection with attending trainings and other events on topics including committee roles and responsibilities, and legal and ethical developments. We also provide educational sessions periodically to the Board on our business, industry developments, and other pertinent topics.

Board Meetings and Attendance

Our Board held 8 meetings during 2021. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of all the 2021 meetings of the Board and the committees for which he or she served as a member (held during the period in which the directors served).

Committees

In 2021, the Board had the following standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Strategic Partnerships and Transactions Committee. Each committee has a charter that is available on the investor relations section of our website https://investors.ansys.com/ on the “Governance Documents” page under the “Governance” tab.

The Board may from time to time establish ad hoc and special purpose committees.

Audit Committee

Each member of the Audit Committee is independent as such term is defined in Rule 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards and applicable SEC rules, including the heightened independence requirements for Audit Committee members. In addition, we have determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and our Board has determined that Ms. Scherer and Mr. Frankola each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the SEC rules.

Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Compensation Committee

*Ms. Dorchak will cease service as a member of the Compensation Committee on April 1, 2022.

Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent as such term is defined in Rule 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards and applicable SEC rules, including the heightened independence requirements for Compensation Committee members. Each qualifies as a “non-employee director” under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent as such term is defined in Rule 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Strategic Partnerships and Transactions Committee

Each member of the Strategic Partnerships and Transactions Committee is independent as such term is defined in Rule 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards.

Our Strategic Partnerships and Transactions Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Director Nomination Process

Candidates for nomination to our Board are recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

In recommending candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers persons recommended by directors, officers, and third party consultants or search firms. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee generally provides the third party consultant or search firm with guidance as to the background, skills and abilities, that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is seeking in potential candidates, and the search firm identifies candidates for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration. This process was followed with respect to Dr. Chakravarthy.

Evaluations of candidates generally involve a review of background materials, internal discussions and interviews with selected candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider candidates recommended by stockholders, who are evaluated in the same manner as other director nominees. A stockholder submitting a prospective nominee for the Board should follow the procedures described under “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2023 Annual Meeting.”

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have specific minimum qualifications that must be met for a prospective director candidate to be nominated. However, in identifying potential candidates, it assesses an individual’s background, skills and abilities, and whether such characteristics qualify the individual to fulfill the needs of the Board at that time, and focuses on individuals with certain qualifications, including skills in leadership, technology, risk management, financial acumen, and domestic and global business development. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a specific diversity policy with respect to identifying director candidates, however, it considers diversity in skills, abilities, industry knowledge, and experience, as well as self-identified diversity characteristics, including, gender, race and ethnicity, in reviewing potential candidates.

During 2021, with the assistance of a third-party search firm, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluated potential director candidates, including Dr.  Chakravarthy.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of our Compensation Committee was or is an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and all members are considered independent as such term is defined in Rule 5605 of the Nasdaq listing standards. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the Compensation Committee of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors of any other company that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Compensation Committee.

Director Attendance at the 2021 Annual Meeting

We do not have a policy with respect to directors’ attendance at our annual meeting of stockholders, but directors are encouraged to attend. All of the directors serving at the time of our 2021 annual meeting attended such meeting.

Our non-employee director compensation program is designed to attract, retain and reward qualified directors and align the financial interests of the non-employee directors with those of our stockholders. Pursuant to this program, each non-employee director will receive the cash and equity compensation described below for Board service. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings, assisting with other Company business, such as meeting with potential officer and director candidates, as well as continuing director education.

Non-employee director compensation, including cash retainers for Board and committee service and equity grants, is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and the Board. Our independent executive compensation consulting firm, Compensia, supports the Compensation Committee by providing detailed benchmarks of non-employee director compensation at peer companies, historical non-employee director compensation at the Company, and guidance regarding market trends and policies of proxy advisory firms, among other information. Non-employee director compensation is subject to the approval of the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews its independent executive compensation consulting firm, and also verifies annually the independence of any firm used to provide such support.

Cash Compensation

During 2021, our non-employee directors were entitled to receive the following cash fees:

With respect to the Strategic Partnerships and Transactions Committee, in any one year, measured from annual meeting of stockholders to annual meeting of stockholders, a member will receive $1,000 for every telephonic meeting and $1,500 for every in-person meeting in excess of eight meetings.

Equity Compensation

Each then-serving non-employee director is granted a Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) award having a value of $300,000 on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. If an independent director’s commencement date is other than the date of an annual meeting of stockholders, such independent director may be granted, on such independent director’s commencement date, an annual award having an award value prorated based on the number of days between such director’s commencement date and the next annual meeting of stockholders.

The annual RSU awards will vest upon the earlier of one year after grant or the next annual meeting of stockholders, subject to accelerated or prorated vesting under certain circumstances such as death or disability or change in control of the Company. Shares of our common stock will generally be issued at, or shortly following, the vesting of the RSUs. The grant date market value for determining the number of shares of common stock subject to each RSU award will be the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock over the 20 trading days immediately preceding and including the grant date.

Prior to 2016, certain of our non-employee directors were granted deferred stock units (“DSUs”) as part of our director compensation program. In 2016, our Compensation Committee approved a plan to allow our non-employee directors to diversify DSUs held by them, subject to the Director Stock Ownership Guidelines described below. Since November 1, 2016, non-employee directors have been permitted to individually choose whether to retain all or part of their DSUs or to elect another investment alternative, such as an index or mutual fund or funds. This program is subject in all respects to our Director Stock Ownership Guidelines, meaning that directors would only be permitted to diversify DSUs held in excess of the required minimum ownership guidelines.

Our employee directors do not receive additional compensation for service on the Board.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Non-employee directors are required to satisfy minimum stock ownership guidelines. Under these guidelines, non-employee directors are required to own equity in the form of common stock or DSUs of the Company equal to a minimum of five times the annual cash retainer. This ownership requirement is competitive with the practices of our peer group. Each non-employee director is required to maintain this minimum amount throughout his or her tenure as a member of our Board. New Board members have five years to attain this minimum stock ownership level. In 2021, each non-employee director had met their stock ownership guidelines or is on track to do so by the end of the applicable five-year period. Our current Corporate Governance Guidelines containing these stock ownership guidelines are available on the investor relations section of our website https://investors.ansys.com/ on the “Governance Documents” page under the “Governance” tab.

Notwithstanding its selection and even if our stockholders ratify the selection, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of Ansys and our stockholders. At the 2022 Annual Meeting, stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Our Audit Committee is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the 2022 Annual

Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee may reconsider the appointment.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022.

The foregoing Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing of Ansys under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the Audit Committee Report by reference therein.

Independent Registered Accounting Firm Services and Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, including the reviews of the financial statements included in our Form 10-Q filings and general accounting consultations.

“Audit fees” in 2021 and 2020 consisted of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and management’s report on internal control included in our annual reports on Form 10-K and for the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as well as services that generally only our independent registered public accountants can reasonably provide, including statutory audits and services rendered in connection with SEC filings.

“Audit-related fees” in 2021 and 2020 consisted of assurance and related services by Deloitte & Touche LLP that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and internal controls, including financial and tax due diligence related to business acquisitions.

“Tax fees” in 2021 and 2020 consisted of fees billed for tax compliance, consultation and planning services. Tax fees in 2021 did not exceed aggregate audit and audit-related fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP, and $812,208 of the tax fees incurred in 2021 related to tax return preparation services. Tax fees in 2020 did not exceed aggregate audit and audit-related fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP, and $606,156 of the tax fees incurred in 2020 related to tax return preparation services.

All of the services described above related to audit fees, audit-related fees, and tax fees performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2021 and 2020 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy and procedures adopted by our Audit Committee and in effect for those fiscal years. The policy required that during each of the Audit Committee’s scheduled quarterly meetings, a description of services requested to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm during the following quarter be submitted to the Audit Committee for approval. Any request for audit, audit-related, tax and other services not contemplated during the quarterly approval process were submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval and did not commence until such approval had been granted.

In February 2020, the Audit Committee adopted new audit and non-audit services pre-approval procedures. Under these procedures, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all services provided by the independent auditor to assure that these services do not impair the independence of the auditor. Unless the type of service is both on a list of pre-approved services and within the quarterly and per service dollar limits established by the procedures, such service will require the specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Under the procedures, the Audit Committee can delegate its responsibility to specifically pre-approve certain permitted services to a member or members of the Audit Committee. Any pre-approval granted by delegates must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the 2022 Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the

Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, and other related disclosure.”

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

The following table identifies certain information about our executive officers as of March 28, 2022.

Ajei Gopal Biographical information for Dr. Gopal is set forth in “Proposal 1: Election of Three Class II Directors for Three-Year Terms– Continuing Directors Following the 2022 Annual Meeting.”

Nicole Anasenes has served as Ansys’ Chief Financial Officer since 2021. Previously, Ms. Anasenes served as Senior Vice President of Ansys in 2020 and was a member of the Company’s Board of Directors from 2018 until 2020. From 2016 until 2020, Ms. Anasenes served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Squarespace, Inc., which sells subscription software to help customers establish and manage their online presence and stores. From 2013 to 2015, she served as Chief Financial Officer of Infor, a cloud application software company. Before joining Infor, from 2002 to 2013, she worked at IBM in various leadership positions in corporate finance, M&A and market development.

Shane Emswiler has served as Ansys’ Senior Vice President of Products since 2020. From 2019 to 2020, he was Ansys’ Senior Vice President and General Manager, Physics business units. He also previously served as Vice President

of Ansys’ mechanical, fluids and electronics business units from 2017 until 2019. From 2010 until 2017, he served as Vice President and General Manager of Ansys’ electronics business unit. Prior to this, Mr. Emswiler served as Chief Financial Officer of Ansoft Corporation, a company acquired by Ansys in 2008.

Janet Lee has served as Ansys’ Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since 2017. From 2010 to 2017, she was the Vice President, Legal and Intellectual Property, at HERE Technologies, a mapping technology company. Prior to this, from 2007 to 2010, she held positions of increasing responsibility at Nokia Corporation, including as a Director for Legal and Intellectual Property supporting the Nokia Research Center and Vice President for Legal and Intellectual Property matters for services. Prior to Nokia Corporation, Ms. Lee served as an Assistant General Counsel at America Online, Inc.

Richard Mahoney has served as Ansys’ Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Customer Excellence since 2018. Mr. Mahoney joined the Company in 2016 as Vice President and was promoted to Senior Vice President in 2018. Prior to joining the Company, from 2014 to 2016, he was Senior Vice President, Design Enablement and International Sales, at Global Foundries, a semiconductor manufacturing company. Prior to that time, starting in 1989, he held positions of increasing responsibility at Cadence Design Systems, including Senior Vice President of Worldwide Field Operations with responsibility for worldwide sales, field application engineering, customer support and sales operations.

Maria Shields has served as Ansys’ Senior Vice President of Administration since 2021. In December 2021, she notified the Company of her decision to resign, effective on April 1, 2022. She previously served as our Chief Financial Officer from 1998 until 2021 and served as an Ansys Vice President from 1998 until 2018, when she was promoted to Senior Vice President. Ms. Shields joined the Company in 1994 as Ansys’ Corporate Controller. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Shields held various positions as a CPA with Deloitte & Touche LLP, including that of audit manager.

Our Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section describes the compensation of our named executive officers. Our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2021 are Ajei Gopal, Nicole Anasenes, who assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer on March 1, 2021, Maria Shields, who completed service as Chief Financial Officer on February 28, 2021 and subsequently assumed the role of Senior Vice President of Administration, Richard Mahoney, Shane Emswiler, and Janet Lee.

Overview of Compensation Program & Philosophy

Paying for performance is the guiding principle of Ansys’ total rewards strategy. Our philosophy is to target total compensation for an effective performer at or near the 50^th percentile of the relevant market, with the opportunity to earn above or below target compensation based on achieved results. However, for a superior performer, Ansys’ philosophy is to provide opportunities for total compensation that is influenced by the upper quartile of the market data.

Our Compensation Committee structures total compensation paid to our named executive officers to be reasonable, competitive and principally performance-based. Generally, the types of compensation and benefits provided to our named executive officers are similar to those provided to our other officers and employees of the Company.

Fiscal 2021 Financial Highlights

We reported GAAP revenue of $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of 13% in both reported and constant currency*, when compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. We reported GAAP diluted earnings per share of $5.16 for fiscal 2021 compared to $4.97

for fiscal 2020. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $7.37* for fiscal 2021 compared with $6.70* for fiscal 2020. ACV was $1.9 billion*, an increase of 16% in both reported and constant currency when compared to fiscal 2020. GAAP operating margin was 26.9% and non-GAAP operating margin was 41.4%* and deferred revenue and backlog was $1,257.9 million at December 31, 2021, an increase of 30% over December 31, 2020. Financial results included operating cash flows of $549.5 million for 2021 compared to $547.3 million for 2020.

Our three-year TSR was 180.62% for fiscal 2021 and compared favorably to all relative indices as set forth on page 6 of this proxy.

* Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, non-GAAP operating margin and constant currency are non-GAAP measures. For additional information on non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, non-GAAP operating margin, and constant currency, please see Annex A: Non-GAAP Reconciliations. ACV is a metric we use to better understand the business. There is no GAAP measure comparable to ACV. For a description of ACV, see the section titled “Performance Metrics for 2021 PSU Awards” in this proxy statement.

2021 Say-on-Pay

Approximately 89% of our stockholders voting on the 2021 Say-on-Pay proposal approved the compensation of our named executive officers at our 2021 annual meeting. The Compensation Committee considered the results of the 2021 non-binding advisory Say-on-Pay proposal in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities regarding executive compensation and determined that the vote result did not indicate that the Compensation Committee should consider changes to the program based on such vote.

Objectives of Our Compensation Program

The main objective of our executive compensation program is to serve as an integral part of a competitive total rewards package to attract, retain and incent qualified executive officers who will lead us to long-term success and enhance stockholder value based on the balanced attainment of short-term performance objectives and long-term strategic goals. Each element of our compensation program supports these objectives.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain the services and obtain the advice of external advisors, including compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors to assist in the evaluation of executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee has directly engaged Compensia to conduct an executive compensation market analysis and review of our short-term cash and long-term equity incentive practices to help ensure they align with market practices. Compensia reviewed and advised on all principal aspects of our 2021 executive compensation program, including:

Outside of its services to the Compensation Committee, Compensia provides no other services to us. The Compensation Committee evaluated the independence of Compensia and determined that it is independent. The Compensation Committee also determined that Compensia’s work for the Company in 2021 did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Role of Compensation Committee and Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

Our Compensation Committee works in close collaboration with the full Board on executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee has a practice of informing and consulting with the full Board concerning the establishment of performance goals and objectives for our CEO, Dr. Gopal, evaluating our CEO’s performance in light of the goals and objectives that were set, and determining the CEO’s compensation based on that evaluation. Dr. Gopal serves on our Board but recuses himself from any deliberations about his compensation.

For 2021, Dr. Gopal prepared an analysis for the Compensation Committee recommending each element of compensation to be paid to all other executive officers. The Compensation Committee considered his recommendations, along with an analysis from Compensia, in approving the compensation of our other executive officers.

In addition to Dr. Gopal and Compensia, our Human Resources team provides advice, analysis and recommendations to our Compensation Committee.

Peer Group Considerations

Our peer group of companies used for compensation benchmarking purposes was recommended by Compensia. Peer company selection criteria, which are aligned with the market, include:

The peer group used to assess the competitiveness of our 2021 compensation consisted of the following companies:

We ranked at the 42^nd percentile on revenue, 55^th percentile on 30-day average market cap, 28^th percentile on number of employees and 85^th percentile on operating margin within this group when Compensia conducted the analysis in July 2020.

Components of Compensation Program and Fiscal 2021 Compensation

Our executive compensation program consists of the following principal components:

We also provide our employees, including our executive officers, with comprehensive employee benefit programs such as, in the United States, medical, dental and vision insurance, a 401(k) plan, life and disability insurance, flexible spending accounts, an employee stock purchase plan, financial planning and other plans and programs made available to eligible employees generally.

We emphasize performance-based, variable incentive compensation over fixed compensation, such as base salary. Each element of compensation is chosen in order to attract, incent, and retain the necessary executive talent and to reward corporate performance by creating a balance between shorter-term corporate performance and providing incentives for the attainment of long-term strategic goals and enhancing stockholder value. The allocation of each element of compensation is determined by our Compensation Committee for each executive based on the following factors:

While we believe in structuring executive compensation plans that give our executives incentives to deliver certain objective elements of corporate financial performance over specified time periods, we do not believe in a purely mechanical approach. Instead, part of our executive compensation philosophy includes an element of reward for non-quantitative achievements demonstrated by our executives in the actions and decisions they make throughout the year. When establishing our executive compensation plans for a given year, it is not possible to foresee all the challenges and demands that will present to our executives, both as a management team and in their areas of individual responsibility. We believe that rewarding decision-making and leadership builds a management team capable of creating stockholder value over the longer term. At the same time, rewarding the achievement of quantifiable results helps ensure executives remain disciplined in delivering shorter-term financial results.

The allocation of an executive officer’s compensation among each of the compensation components is based on our competitive benchmarking, our recruiting and retention goals, our view of internal fairness and consistency and other considerations that our Compensation Committee deems relevant, such as extraordinary performance. While our Compensation Committee does not have a formula for determining the appropriate allocation between cash and non-cash compensation or short-term and long-term performance-based compensation, historically our Compensation Committee has allocated a greater percentage of an executive’s total compensation to equity.

Base Salaries

We pay base salaries to attract talented executives and to provide a fixed base level of cash compensation. Base salaries for executive officers are individually determined by the Compensation Committee after consideration of:

There are generally three reasons for adjustments to our executives’ base salaries: annual increases, promotions or change in role, and market adjustments. The Compensation Committee considers base salary increases for our executive officers annually, based on the factors described above. The Compensation Committee’s review of these factors is subjective, and no fixed value or weight is assigned to any specific factor when making salary decisions.

2021 Base Salaries

The table below sets forth the 2021 annual base salaries for our named executive officers:

Base salary increases reflect annual adjustments based on peer group market data provided by Compensia, the recommendations of Dr. Gopal (other than with respect to his own base salary), and individual performance. Mr. Emswiler’s 2021 base salary increase was intended to bring his salary more in line with market median.

Performance Based Cash Bonuses

A key compensation objective is to have a significant portion of each named executive officer’s compensation tied to our performance. In support of this objective, we generally provide annual performance-based cash bonuses for our named executive officers, based on achievement against corporate and individual performance objectives established at the beginning of the calendar year. Performance-based cash bonuses are designed to reward executives based on the achievement of our financial goals as well as individual performance goals tied to the executive’s functional role. Executives are assigned a target bonus opportunity each year. Actual bonus awards are calculated based on our financial performance during the year and achievement of individual performance results, which are considered on a qualitative basis. At the

beginning of 2021, the Board approved the performance objectives for the Company that the Compensation Committee and Dr. Gopal used to design our named executive officers’ cash bonus opportunity for 2021. The Compensation Committee determined and approved both individual and Company metrics.

The Compensation Committee determined that non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP operating income were the appropriate financial performance metrics to measure short term company performance. The weightings of non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP operating income and individual performance to determine the overall performance based annual cash bonus are set forth in the tables below.

*Performance ranges from 0-200% on this metric as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Payouts as a percentage of target are subject to straight line interpolation to the extent that the performance metrics are achieved between the percentage levels outlined in the tables above.

Non-GAAP revenue is calculated in accordance with GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2021, and then adjusted to include revenue not reported during the period as a result of the acquisition accounting adjustment associated with the accounting for deferred revenue in business combinations. For the purpose of calculating performance for compensation, non-GAAP revenue is further adjusted to reflect results at planned foreign currency exchange rates.

Non-GAAP operating income is calculated in accordance with GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2021 and then adjusted to (i) include revenue not reported during the period as a result of the acquisition accounting adjustment associated with the accounting for deferred revenue in business combinations, (ii) exclude stock-based compensation expense and excess payroll taxes related to stock-based awards, (iii) exclude amortization expense associated with intangible assets acquired in business combinations, and (iv) exclude transaction expenses related to business combinations. For the purpose of calculating performance for compensation, non-GAAP operating income is further adjusted to reflect results at planned foreign currency exchange rates.

The individual results are determined for each of our named executive officers by using qualitative goals that are established at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the CEO’s qualitative goals, which are aimed at implementing the Company’s strategic objectives. The CEO then leads a discussion with the Compensation Committee about the qualitative goals of the named executive officers, which are intended to implement the CEO’s goals and the primary areas of focus of the relevant functional duties. Each qualitative goal of the named executive officers approved by the Compensation Committee takes into account the strategic priorities of the Company and the most impactful way in which the relevant business unit or function can meet the Company’s overall targets. The Compensation Committee believes these qualitative individual goals are challenging, yet attainable. Due to their long-term strategic nature, we do not disclose details of the goals tied to the individual results. For the named executive officers, the qualitative goals for 2021 included operational improvements to support the business as it scales, talent acquisition diversity objectives to attract, retain and promote diverse top talent, successful completion of acquisitions and partnerships in line with strategic objectives and the seamless integration of newly acquired companies, enhancing core technologies and extending adjacent technologies, and strengthening investor engagement.

2021 Target Performance Based Cash Bonus Opportunities

The target annual cash bonus opportunities for our named executive officers are expressed as a percentage of their respective base salaries. The table below shows the target bonus amount for each named executive officer as a percentage of base salary and as a corresponding cash amount:

*Amounts shown relate to base earnings for 2021 as shown in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table (2021, 2020, and 2019).

2021 Actual Performance Based Cash Bonus Payments

We achieved the following results as it relates to the 2021 Performance Based Cash Bonus metrics:

*Actual performance is 111% but capped at 110%.

As a result of individual performance results of 125% for Maria Shields, 150% for Shane Emswiler and Janet Lee, and 200% for Ajei Gopal, Nicole Anasenes, and Richard Mahoney, the Compensation Committee awarded cash bonuses in the following amounts:

*Rounded to the nearest tenth percent. Amounts shown relate to base earnings for 2021 as shown in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table (2021, 2020, and 2019).

Long-Term Equity Compensation

Our executive compensation program includes stock-based awards, the value of which depend on our stock performance and other performance measures, which are intended to drive strong long-term performance. The stock-based awards consist of PSUs and time based RSUs.

PSUs align our executive officers’ pay to our financial performance based on specific metrics. The Compensation Committee determined that ACV, non-GAAP operating cash flows, and a metric based on our TSR compared to the return on the Nasdaq Composite Index (the “Index”) were the appropriate metrics to measure longer term company performance for purposes of the 2021 regular-cycle three-year PSUs, as they provided a balance of short-term and long-term growth and profitability to drive long-term stockholder value.

RSUs offer value delivery to our executive officers while promoting alignment of their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders in a manner consistent with the compensation practices of our peer companies. For the reasons described above, we believe that the combination of PSUs and RSUs motivates and retains our valued executive officers. In the future, we may introduce other forms of equity compensation to our executive officers that are also aligned with the interests of our stockholders.

The Compensation Committee, in consultation with our CEO (other than with respect to his own compensation), determines the size, mix, material terms and metrics (in the case of PSUs) of equity awards granted to each of our executive officers. The Committee takes into consideration factors such as the scope of the named executive officer’s role and, responsibilities, competitive market data provided by Compensia, individual performance and retention risk.

Similar to previous years, the Compensation Committee decided to grant an equal amount of regular-cycle PSU (measured at a target award level) and RSU awards for 2021. Each named executive officer received 50% of their long-term equity compensation in the form of RSUs and 50% of their long-term equity compensation in the form of PSUs. 80% of the PSUs are based on metrics related to the Company’s financial performance (the “Operating Metric PSUs”) and 20% of the PSUs are based on a performance metric measured against the Company’s three-year relative TSR (the “TSR PSUs”). In addition, Ms. Lee received additional incremental grants of PSUs in 2021, as described below.

Performance Metrics for Regular-Cycle 2021 PSU Awards

For the 2021 TSR PSUs, similar to previous years, the Compensation Committee will measure our TSR compared to the Index at the end of a three-year cumulative performance period ending December 31, 2023. The TSR calculation will be based upon the return of the 10-trading day average price of the Company and the Index preceding the start of the performance period (January 1, 2021) and the return of the 10-trading day average price at the end of the relevant period (December 31, 2023). The 2021 TSR PSUs will be earned at 100% if our TSR equals the return of the Index at the end of the cumulative three-year performance period.

The target award will be reduced by three percentage points for each percentage point by which the return of the Index exceeds the Ansys TSR and will be reduced to zero percent if the return of the Index exceeds the Ansys TSR by more than twenty-five percentage points. If Ansys has a negative TSR but it is still higher than the Index, a maximum of 100% of the target may be earned.

The target award will be increased by four percentage points for each percentage point by which the Ansys TSR exceeds the return of the Index, up to a maximum of two hundred percent (200%) of the target award.

For purposes of illustration, the performance assessment is as follows:

Please see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2021 Table” for additional information about these equity awards.

For the Operating Metric PSUs, three, one-year sub-performance periods are used to measure performance against annual goals that are determined by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the relevant year. At the end of each sub-performance period, performance against the pre-established goals is measured and certified. Earned shares for each one-year sub-performance period will vest at the end of the three-year performance period, with payment being contingent upon the named executive officer’s continued employment through the vesting date.

For the 2021 sub-performance period of the 2019, 2020, and 2021 Operating Metric PSUs, the Compensation Committee selected ACV with an operating cash flows modifier, as described below.

ACV is a financial metric for which there is no comparable GAAP measure. This metric is calculated as follows:

To arrive at adjusted ACV, we calculated ACV for the year ended December 31, 2021 and then adjusted to reflect results at planned foreign currency exchange rates.

Adjusted operating cash flow was calculated in accordance with GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2021, and then adjusted to reflect results at planned foreign currency exchange rates.

2021 PSU Awards

Each named executive officer received 50% of their target long-term equity compensation in the form of PSUs, 80% of which are based on performance against metrics related to the Company’s financial performance (ACV and non-GAAP operating cash flows, each as adjusted) and 20% of which are based on performance against the Company’s three-year relative TSR.

In addition, in 2021, Ms. Lee was granted 565 additional incremental Operating Metric PSUs relating to the 2020 tranche of her 2018, 2019, and 2020 Operating Metric PSU awards, the terms and performance results of which are described in our 2021 proxy statement filed with the SEC. The 2018 Operating Metric PSUs and the 2019 Operating Metric PSUs were paid out following the end of three-year

periods ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021, respectively (as described below for the 2019 Operating Metric PSUs). The 2020 Operating Metric PSUs will pay out at the end of a three-year period ending December 31, 2022, subject to continued employment.

TSR Metric

As described above, the 2021 TSR PSUs are based on our TSR as compared to the return of the Index at the end of a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2023.

Operating Metric

In 2021, we achieved adjusted ACV of $1,874.0 million and adjusted non-GAAP operating cash flows of $551.7 million resulting in a payout at 200% of target for the 2021 sub-performance period for each of the 2021, 2020 and 2019 Operating Metric PSUs. In the case of the 2021 Operating Metric PSUs, the underlying shares for the first sub-performance period will vest three years from the grant date contingent upon the named executive officer’s continued employment through the vesting date.

2021 RSU Awards

Each named executive officer received 50% of their target long-term equity compensation in the form of RSUs, which generally vest ratably on the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date.

2019 and 2020 PSU Awards

TSR Metric

The 2019 TSR PSUs were paid out following the end of a three-year period ended December 31, 2021. The TSR calculation was based upon the return of the 10-trading day average price of the Company and the Index preceding the start of the performance period (January 1, 2019) and the return of the 10-trading day average price at the end of the performance period (December 31, 2021). For the 2019 TSR PSUs, the results were as follows:

Under the terms of the award, maximum payout (200%) occurred if the Company’s TSR outperformed the Index by 25 percentage points or more. The Company’s TSR outperformed the Index by 42.68 percentage points resulting in a maximum payout of 200%.

This resulted in the following share payouts to our NEOs:

The 2020 TSR PSUs measure our TSR as compared to the Index at the end of a three-year period ending December 31, 2022 and will pay out, if earned, following the end of that period.

Operating Metric

Under the terms of the 2019 Operating Metric PSUs, the 2021 third sub-performance period was earned at 200% based on the performance scale described above. Upon the completion of the performance period for this award, the following shares were paid out for the three sub-performance periods:

For the 2020 Operating Metric PSU awards, the 2021 second sub-performance period was earned at 200% based on the performance scale described above. The underlying

shares for the second sub-performance period will vest three years from the grant date contingent upon the named executive officer’s continued employment through the vesting date.

Other Compensation Policies and Information

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Employee benefits are provided to all eligible employees, including our named executive officers, which the Compensation Committee believes are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation objective to better enable us to attract and retain employees. These benefits include, in the United States, medical, dental and vision insurance, health savings account, a 401(k) retirement plan, life and disability insurance, flexible spending accounts, an employee stock purchase plan, and other programs.

We provide limited perquisites to our executives. We have no deferred compensation, pension arrangements, post-retirement health coverage or similar benefits for our executives that are not generally available to other eligible employees, other than as provided under the Executive Severance Plan and the CEO’s employment agreement, details of which are included below under “Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements.” In addition, we pay for the cost of financial planning services provided by a third party to assist our executives with managing complex investment, tax, legal and estate planning matters so that the executives can remain focused on our business priorities rather than personal financial concerns. While we pay for the cost of this voluntary benefit, the executive is responsible for the taxes on the value of this benefit.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board believes that directors and senior officers should hold a meaningful financial stake in the Company to further align their interests with those of our stockholders and to build an ownership mentality among our senior employees. As a result, the Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for senior management. As of December 31, 2021, each of the named executive officers was in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines. The Board most recently reviewed and modified these guidelines as of October 28, 2021. These modifications included removing stock options from eligibility to count towards stock ownership requirements.

Delegation Authority

Under the terms of the ANSYS, Inc. 2021 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2021 Plan”), the Compensation

Committee may delegate to one or more of its members, to one or more officers of the Company, or to one or more agents or advisors, certain duties or powers under the 2021 Plan, including by authorizing one or more officers of the Company to designate employees to be recipients of awards and determine the size of such awards (provided that the Compensation Committee may not delegate such authority with respect to awards granted to the Company’s executive officers or directors).

Pursuant to such delegation authority and the terms of the ANSYS, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Grant Policy, the Compensation Committee has authorized the CEO to grant awards of restricted stock units (including both time-based and performance-based) to employees of the Company, other than executive officers.

Clawback of Compensation

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, if our Board determines, in its sole discretion, that our financial results are restated, whether in part or in their entirety, due to misconduct by one or more executive officers, the Board has the discretion to use commercially reasonable best efforts to remedy the misconduct and prevent its recurrence. The Board may determine, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to (i) recoup any bonus or other performance-based compensation that has been paid, (ii) cancel any equity-based awards made, and/or (iii) recoup any gains from equity-based awards made, to any executive officer engaged in such misconduct. The Board may also take any of the actions described in the preceding sentence with respect to compensation paid or awarded in the preceding three years if an executive violates the terms of a non-competition agreement with the Company.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Under our Insider Trading Policy and Procedures, no director, executive officer, or employee may at any time purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, puts, calls, and

exchange funds), or otherwise engage in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of our equity securities that are (i) granted to them by us as part of their compensation or (ii) held, directly or indirectly, by them.

Directors and executive officers are prohibited from holding our securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.

Post-Employment Compensation

Retirement Benefits

We do not provide pension arrangements or post-retirement health coverage for our executives, except as provided in our Executive Severance Plan and the CEO’s employment agreement. Our U.S.-based employees, including the executives, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan or that of one of our subsidiaries. In any plan year, we will contribute to each participant a matching contribution as follows: a dollar-for-dollar match for the first 3% an employee contributes to their 401(k) account, and a 25% match on the next 5% an employee contributes, for a maximum matching payment by us of 4.25%. All

executives are eligible to participate in the retirement plans offered generally to employees in the location where they are employed.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not provide any nonqualified defined contribution or other deferred compensation plans to our executive officers.

Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements

Our executive officers do not have employment agreements with us except in the case of our CEO as described below.

Dr. Gopal Employment Agreement

We entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Gopal on August 29, 2016 (the “Gopal Agreement”), pursuant to which Dr. Gopal’s employment was for an initial term of one year and annually automatically renews for additional one-year periods unless either party elects not to renew on 60 days prior written notice or the employment is earlier terminated by either party.

Under the terms of the Gopal Agreement, in the event that Dr. Gopal’s employment with us is terminated by us without “Cause” or as a result of his resignation with “Good Reason,” (each as defined in the Gopal Agreement) Dr. Gopal will be entitled to (i) receive an amount equal to two times the sum of his then effective base salary plus his target bonus, payable over 24 months in equal installments, (ii) in certain circumstances, a monthly payment would be made by us of an amount equal to the employer health insurance contribution amount that would have been paid in respect of Dr. Gopal for at most 24 months following such termination and (iii) the period of time during which Dr. Gopal may exercise his vested stock options shall be extended to the longer of (x) three months after his date of termination or (y) seven days after the commencement of our first open trading window that occurs after the date of termination, but in no event later than the 10-year expiration date of such options.

If a termination under such circumstances occurs during the period beginning 60 days prior to the effective date of a definitive agreement that will result in a change in control and ending 18 months after the consummation (closing) of a change in control, then, in lieu of the benefits described in the foregoing paragraph, Dr. Gopal will be entitled to (a) the amounts described in clause (i) above, which will be paid in a lump sum in certain circumstances rather than over 24 months, (b) the acceleration and vesting of all outstanding stock options or other stock-based awards held by Dr. Gopal, subject to any performance or metric-based requirements set forth therein which shall be separately determined as set forth in the applicable award agreement and (c) in certain circumstances, a monthly payment by us of an amount equal to the employer health insurance contribution amount that would have been paid in respect of Dr. Gopal for at most 24 months following such termination.

Dr. Gopal has agreed to be subject to certain non-competition, non-solicitation and non-hire provisions

during the term of his employment and for 24 months following the termination of his employment, subject to certain limited exceptions.

Executive Severance Plan

On February 17, 2010, we adopted the ANSYS, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, which was amended as of July 29, 2014, (the “Executive Severance Plan”), for executives and other employees selected for participation by our Compensation Committee. The Executive Severance Plan applies to all named executive officers with the exception of Dr. Gopal whose severance terms are set forth in the Gopal Agreement.

Pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan, covered executives whose employment with us is terminated for any reason other than for cause, death or disability will receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to the sum of six months’ base salary and target bonus and an amount equal to the earned, but unpaid, portion of the covered executive’s target bonus, as well as 12 months’ health and welfare benefits and outplacement services up to $15,000. In the event the employment of a covered executive is terminated for any reason other than for cause, death or disability, or by the covered executive with good reason, in either case within 18 months after a change in control of the Company, the covered executive will (a) receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to the sum of 12 months’ base salary and target bonus and an amount equal to the earned, but unpaid, portion of the covered executive’s target bonus, (b) receive 12 months’ health and welfare benefits and outplacement services up to $15,000 and (c) have all outstanding stock based awards accelerate and become fully vested and non-forfeitable as of the date of such termination of employment.

Our executive equity award agreements also provide for “double- trigger” vesting (a change in control and qualifying employment termination).

In all cases, receipt of severance payments is conditioned on the timely execution of an appropriate release of claims on the part of the terminated executive.

For additional information regarding our change in control severance arrangements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Under Employment or Other Agreements Table.”

Our Compensation Committee has implemented these arrangements to protect the interests of our senior executives when a potential change in control could affect our executives’ job security, authority or compensation, and believes that these arrangements help us recruit and retain executive-level talent. These change in control severance arrangements also promote the interests of our stockholders by mitigating the senior executives’ concerns about such potential matters and thereby assuring that management provides guidance to the Board and stockholders that is not related to such concerns. In the event employment is terminated for reason of death or disability, all unvested RSUs will become immediately vested. Unvested PSUs will vest, as scheduled, on a prorated basis, based on the achievement of the applicable metrics.

The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Compensia, assesses and considers potential risks when reviewing and approving our compensation policies and practices for our executive officers and employees, with particular attention to risks related to the Company’s use of, and degree of use of, equity and incentive-based compensation as a portion of the total compensation paid to the executive officers. We have designed our compensation programs, including our incentive compensation plans, with features to address potential risks while rewarding employees for achieving financial and strategic objectives through prudent business judgement and appropriate risk taking. Based upon its assessment, the Compensation Committee believes that any risks arising from our compensation programs do not create disproportionate incentives for our employees to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on us in the future.

Our Compensation Committee considered the following elements of our compensation plans and policies when evaluating whether our plans and policies encourage our executives and employees to take unreasonable risks: